, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




     Below is a letter that sums up what is wrong with the our union of Sovereign states (but like always, do some research to find out if this is true, then you have the knowledge and the understanding).

(((( Please review the data concerning the subversion of our nation at web sites
and “Admiralty Courts in Colorado?”http://www.frii.com/~gosplow/admir.html
Inform all of the members of the veterans organizations in your town and concerned citizens everywhere to the exact extent that we have been misinformed.))))

This Treason and Tyranny by the bankers, the lawyers and judiciary, the bought politicians, and other vested interests is not what we or our ancestors fought and died for.

It is time for all men who took the oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, to be fully informed and take the actions necessary to uphold their oath. This is no time for us to rest on the laurels of our past. The best action we can take is to inform all the people so they can make fully informed decisions at the ballot box.

Thank you for your attention and assistance in passing this data along to We the People!!

The Letter below is restored from a page that disappeared from the WEB

AMERICAN PEOPLE, YOU have the ability to understand the information in this letter. YOU have the ability to understand the present law and past law, the Constitution. That’s right!…I’m saying the Constitution is past tense, as a restrictive document on Congress. I do not make this statement lightly and I can prove it.

The Constitution was a commercial compact between states, giving the federal government limited powers. The Bill of Rights was meant not as our source of rights, but as further limitations on the federal government. Our fore-fathers saw the potential for danger in the U. S. Constitution. To insure the Constitution was not presumed to be our source of rights, the 10th Amendment was added. I will use a quote from Thomas Jefferson, February 15, 1791, where he quotes the 10th Amendment…

“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground; That “all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.” To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”

The created United States government cannot define the rights of their creator, the American people. Three forms of law were granted to the Constitution, common law, equity (contract law) and Admiralty law. Each had their own jurisdiction and purpose. The first issue I want to cover is the United States flag. Obviously from known history our flag did not have a yellow fringe bordering three sides. The United States did not start putting flags with a yellow fringe on them in government buildings and public buildings until 1959. Of course the question you would ask yourself; why did it change and are there any legal meanings behind this? Oh yes!

First the appearance of our flag is defined in Title 4 sec. 1. U.S.C..

“The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field.” (Note – of course when new states are admitted new stars are added.)

A foot note was added on page 1113 of the same section which says:

“Placing of fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag, and arrangement of the stars are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but within the discretion of the President as Commander-In-Chief of the Army and Navy.” – 1925, 34 Op.Atty.Gen. 483.

The president as military commander can add a yellow fringe to our flag. When would this be done? During a time of war. Why? A flag with a fringe is an ensign, a military flag. Read the following.

“Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.”

From the National Encyclopedia, Volume 4:

“Flag, an emblem of a nation; usually made of cloth and flown from a staff. From a military standpoint flags are of two general classes, those flown from stationary masts over army posts, and those carried by troops in formation. The former are referred to by the general name flags. The latter are called colors when carried by dismounted troops. Colors and Standards are more nearly square than flags and are made of silk with a knotted Fringe of Yellow on three sides………..use of the flag. The most general and appropriate use of the flag is as a symbol of authority and power.”

The reason I started with the Flag issue is because it is so easy to grasp. The main problem I have with the yellow fringe is that by its use our Constitutional Republic is no more. Our system of law was changed without the public’s knowledge. It was kept secret. This is fraud. The American people were allowed to believe this was just a decoration. Because the law changed from Common Law (God’s Law) to Admiralty Law (the kings law) your status also changed from sovereign to subject. From being able to own property (allodial title) to not owning property (tenet on the land). If you think you own your property, stop paying taxes, it will be taken under the prize law.

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called `ownership’ is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” – Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts payable in Gold” written in 1933.

By our allowing to let these military flags fly, the American people have admitted our defeat and loss of status. Read on, you’ll see what I mean. Remember the Constitution recognizes three forms of law, being governed by the Law of the Flag is Admiralty law. I will cover this in a minute, the following is a definition of the legal term Law of the Flag.

“…The agency of the master is devolved upon him by the law of the flag. The same law that confers his authority ascertains its limits, and the flag at the mast-head is notice to all the world of the extent of such power to bind the owners or freighters by his act. The foreigner who deals with this agent has notice of that law, and, if he be bound by it, there is not injustice. His notice is the national flag which is hoisted on every sea and under which the master sails into every port, and every circumstance that connects him with the vessel isolates that vessel in the eyes of the world, and demonstrates his relation to the owners and freighters as their agent for a specific purpose and with power well defined under the national maritime law.” – Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.

Don’t be thrown by the fact they are talking about the sea, and that it doesn’t apply to land, I will prove to you that Admiralty law has come on land. Next a court case:

“Pursuant to the “Law of the Flag”, a military flag does result in jurisdictional implication when flown. The Plaintiff cites the following: “Under what is called international law, the law of the flag, a shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the shipmaster that he intends the law of the flag to regulate those contracts with the shipmaster that he either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all.” – Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41, 45, 185 ILL. 133, 49 LRA 181, 76 AM.

When you walk into a court and see this flag you are put on notice that you are in a Admiralty Court and that the king is in control. Also, if there is a king the people are no longer sovereign. You’re probably saying this is the most incredible thing I have ever heard. YOU have read the proof, it will stand up in court. But wait, there is more, you probably would say, how could this happen? Here’s how. Admiralty law is for the sea, maritime law govern’s contracts between parties that trade over the sea. Well, that’s what our fore-fathers intended. However, in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiralty law could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337, 345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850 and they said:

“The committee also alluded to “the great force” of “the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution….” – Ibid. H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850)

It was up to the Supreme Court to stop Congress and say NO! The Constitution did not give you that power, nor was it intended. But no, the courts began a long train of abuses, here are some excerpts from a few court cases.

“This power is as extensive upon land as upon water. The Constitution makes no distinction in that respect. And if the admiralty jurisdiction, in matters of contract and tort which the courts of the United States may lawfully exercise on the high seas, can be extended to the lakes under the power to regulate commerce, it can with the same propriety and upon the same construction, be extended to contracts and torts on land when the commerce is between different States. And it may embrace also the vehicles and persons engaged in carrying it on (my note – remember what the law of the flag said when you receive benefits from the king.) It would be in the power of Congress to confer admiralty jurisdiction upon its courts, over the cars engaged in transporting passengers or merchandise from one State to another, and over the persons engaged in conducting them, and deny to the parties the trial by jury. Now the judicial power in cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, has never been supposed to extend to contracts made on land and to be executed on land. But if the power of regulating commerce can be made the foundation of jurisdiction in its courts, and a new and extended admiralty jurisdiction beyond its heretofore known and admitted limits, may be created on water under that authority, the same reason would justify the same exercise of power on land.” — Propeller Genessee Chief et al. v. Fitzhugh et al. 12 How. 443 (U.S. 1851)

And all the way back, before the U.S. Constitution John Adams talking about his state’s Constitution, said:

“Next to revenue (taxes) itself, the late extensions of the jurisdiction of the admiralty are our greatest grievance. The American Courts of Admiralty seem to be forming by degrees into a system that is to overturn our Constitution and to deprive us of our best inheritance, the laws of the land. It would be thought in England a dangerous innovation if the trial, of any matter on land was given to the admiralty.” — Jackson v. Magnolia, 20 How. 296 315, 342 (U.S. 1852)

This began the most dangerous precedent of all the Insular Cases. This is where Congress took a boundless field of power. When legislating for the states, they are bound by the Constitution, when legislating for their insular possessions they are not restricted in any way by the Constitution. Read the following quote from the Harvard law review of AMERICAN INS. CO. v. 356 BALES OF COTTON, 26 U.S. 511, 546 (1828), relative to our insular possessions:

“These courts, then, are not constitutional courts in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the general government can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory belonging to the united States. The jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of that judicial power which is conferred in the third article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of those general powers which that body possesses over the territories of the United States.” — Harvard Law Review, Our New Possessions. page 481.

Here are some Court cases that make it even clearer:

“…[T]he United States may acquire territory by conquest or by treaty, and may govern it through the exercise of the power of Congress conferred by Section 3 of Article IV of the Constitution…” “In exercising this power, Congress is not subject to the same constitutional limitations, as when it is legislating for the United States. …And in general the guaranties of the Constitution, save as they are limitations upon the exercise of executive and legislative power when exerted for or over our insular possessions, extend to them only as Congress, in the exercise of its legislative power over territory belonging to the United States, has made those guarantees applicable.” — Hooven & Allison & Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)

“The idea prevails with some indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise.”

“I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will be the result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism.”

“It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the constitution.” — Downes vs Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)

These actions allowed Admiralty law to come on land. If you will remember the definition of the Law of the Flag. When you receive benefits or enter into contracts with the king you come under his law which is Admiralty law. And what is a result of your connection with the king? A loss of your Sovereign status. Our ignorance of the law is no excuse. I’ll give you an example, something you deal with everyday. Let’s say you get a seat belt ticket. What law did you violate? Remember the Constitution recognizes three forms of law. Was it common law? Who was the injured party? No one. So it could not have been common law even though here, the State of N. C. has made chapter 20 of the Motor Vehicle code carry common law penalties, jail time. This was the only thing they could do to cover up the jurisdiction they were operating in. Was it Equity law? No, there is no contract in dispute, driving is a privilege granted by the king. If it were a contract the UCC would apply, and it doesn’t. In a contract both parties have equal rights. In a privilege, you do as you are told or the privilege is revoked. Well guess what, there is only one form of law left, admiralty. Ask yourself when did licenses begin to be required? 1933.

All district courts are admiralty courts, see the Judiciary Act of 1789.

“It is only with the extent of powers possessed by the district courts, acting as instance courts of admiralty, we are dealing. The Act of 1789 gives the entire constitutional power to determine “all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,” leaving the courts to ascertain its limits, as cases may arise.” — Waring ET AL,. v. Clarke, Howard 5 12 L. ed. 1847

When you enter a court room and come before the judge and the U.S. flag with the yellow fringe flying, you are put on notice of the law you are in. American’s aren’t aware of this, so they continue to claim Constitutional rights. In the Admiralty setting the constitution does not apply and the judge, if pushed, will inform you of this by placing you under contempt for continuing to bring it up. If the judge is pressed, his name for this hidden law is statuary law. Where are the rules and regulations for statutory law kept? They don’t exist. If statuary law existed, there would be rules and regulations governing it’s procedures and court rules. They do not exist!!!

The way you know this is Admiralty, is from the yellow fringed flag and from the actions of the law, compelled performance (Admiralty). The judges can still move at common law (murder etc.) and equity (contract disputes etc.). It’s up to the type of case brought before the court. If the case is Admiralty, the only way back to the common law is the saving to suitor clause and action under Admiralty. The court and rules of all three jurisdictions have been blended. Under Admiralty you are compelled to perform under the agreement you made by asking and receiving the king’s government (license). You receive the benefit of driving on federal roads (military roads), so you have voluntarily obligated yourself to this system of law, this is why you are compelled to obey. If you don’t it will cost you money or jail time or both. The type of offence determines the jurisdiction you come under, but the court itself is an Admiralty court, defined by the flag. Driving without a seat belt under Chapter 20 DMV code carries a criminal penalty for a non common law offense. Again where is the injured party or parties, this is Admiralty law. Here is a quote to prove what I said about the roads being military, this is only one benefit, there are many:

“Whilst deeply convinced of these truths, I yet consider it clear that under the war-making power Congress may appropriate money toward the construction of a military road when this is absolutely necessary for the defense of any State or Territory of the Union against foreign invasion. Under the Constitution Congress has power “to declare war,” “to raise and support armies,” “to provide and maintain a navy,” and to call forth the militia to “repel invasions.” Thus endowed, in an ample manner, with the war-making power, the corresponding duty is required that “the United States shall protect each of them [the States] against invasion.” Now, how is it possible to afford this protection to California and our Pacific possessions except by means of a military road through the Territories of the United States, over which men and munitions of war may be speedily transported from the Atlantic States to meet and to repel the invader?…. Besides, the Government, ever since its origin, has been in the constant practice of constructing military roads.” — Inaugural Address of James Buchanan, March 4, 1857,..Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789-1902.

I want to briefly mention the Social Security Act, the nexus Agreement you have with the king. You were told the SS# was for retirement and you had to have it to work. It sounds like a license to me, and it is, it is a license granted by the President to work in this country, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended in March 9, 1933, as you will see in a moment. Was it really for your retirement? What does F.I.C.A. stand for? Federal Insurance Contribution Act. What does contribution mean at law, not Webster’s Dictionary. This is where they were able to get you to admit that you were jointly responsible for the national debt, and you declared that you were a fourteenth Amendment citizen, which I won’t go into in this paper or the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case where common law was over turned. Read the following definition to learn what it means to have a SS# and pay a contribution:

“Contribution. Right of one who has discharged a common liability to recover of another also liable, the aliquot portion which he ought to pay or bear. Under principle of “contribution,” a tort-feasor against whom a judgement is rendered is entitled to recover proportional shares of judgement from other joint tort-feasor whose negligence contributed to the injury and who were also liable to the plaintiff. (Note – tort feasor means wrong doer, what did you do to be defined as a wrong doer???) The share of a loss payable by an insure when contracts with two or more insurers cover the same loss. The insurer’s share of a loss under a coinsurance or similar provision. The sharing of a loss or payment among several. The act of any one or several of a number of co-debtors, co-sureties, etc., in reimbursing one of their number who has paid the whole debt or suffered the whole liability, each to the extent of his proportionate share. — (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th ed.)

Guess what? It gets worse. What does this date 1933 mean? Well you better sit down. First, remember World War I, in 1917 President Wilson declared the War Powers Act of October 6, 1917, basically stating that he was stopping all trade with the enemy except for those he granted a license, excluding Americans. Read the following from this Trading with the enemy Act, where he defines enemy: In the War Powers Act of 1917, Chapter 106, Section 2 (c) it says that these declared war powers did not affect citizens of the United States:

“Such other individuals, or body or class of individuals, as may be natives, citizens, or subjects of any nation with which the United States is at war, OTHER THAN CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, wherever resident or wherever doing business, as the President, if he shall find the safety of the United States of the successful prosecution of the war shall so require, may, by proclamation, include within the term “enemy.”

Now, this leads us up to 1933. Our country was recovering from a depression and now was declared bankrupt. I know you are saying. Do What, the American people were never told about this? Public policy and National Security overruled the public right to know. Read the following Congressional quote:

“My investigation convinced me that during the last quarter of a century the average production of gold has been falling off considerably. The gold mines of the world are practically exhausted. There is only about $11,000,000,000 in gold in the world, with the United States owning a little more than four billions. We have more than $100,000,000,000 in debts payable in gold of the present weight and fineness. . . As a practical proposition these contracts cannot be collected in gold for the obvious reason that the gold supply of the entire world is not sufficient to make payment.” — Congressional Record, Congressman Dies, March 15, 1933

Before 1933 all contracts with the government were payable in gold. Now I ask you? Who in their right mind would enter into contracts totaling One Hundred billion dollars in gold, when there was only eleven billion in gold in the whole world, and we had about four billion. To keep from being hung by the American public they obeyed the banksters demands and turned over our country to them. They never came out and said we were in bankruptcy but, the fact remains, we are. In 1933 the gold of the whole country had to be turned in to the banksters, and all government contracts in gold were canceled. This is bankruptcy.

“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. government.” — Congressman Traficant on the House floor, March 17, 1933

The wealth of the nation including our land was turned over to the banksters. In return, the nations 100 billion dollar debt was forgiven. I have two papers that have circulated the country on this subject. Remember Jesus said “money is the root of all evil” The Congress of 1933 sold every American into slavery to protect their asses. Read the following Congressional quotes:

“I want to show you where the people are being imposed upon by reason of the delegation of this tremendous power. I invite your attention to the fact that section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act provides that whenever the Government of the United States issues and delivers money, Federal Reserve notes, which are based on the credit of the Nation–they represent a mortgage upon your home and my home, and upon all the property of all the people of the Nation–to the Federal Reserve agent, an interest charge shall be collected for the Government.” — Congressional Record, Congressman Patman, March 13, 1933

“That is the equity of what we are about to do. Yes; you are going to close us down. Yes; you have already closed us down, and have been doing it long before this year. Our President says that for 3 years we have been on the way to bankruptcy. We have been on the way to bankruptcy longer than 3 years. We have been on the way to bankruptcy ever since we began to allow the financial mastery of this country gradually to get into the hands of a little clique that has held it right up until they would send us to the grave.” — Congressional Record, Congressman Long, March 11, 1933

What did Roosevelt do? Sealed our fate and our childrens fate, but worst of all, he declared War on the American People. Remember the War Powers Act, the Trading with the enemy Act? He declared emergency powers with his authority being the War Powers Act, the Trading with the enemy Act. The problem is he redefined who the enemy was, read the following: (remember what I said about the SS# being a license to work)

The declared National Emergency of March 9, 1933 amended the War Powers Act to include the American People as enemies:

“In Title 1, Section 1 it says: The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and confirmed.”

“Section 2. Subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President, and export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, BY ANY PERSON WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF.”

Here is the legal phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof, but at law this refers to alien enemy and also applies to Fourteenth Amendment citizens:

“As these words are used in the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution, providing for the citizenship of all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the purpose would appear to have been to exclude by the fewest words (besides children of members of the Indian tribes, standing in a peculiar relation to the National Government, unknown to the common Law), the two classes of cases, children born of *ALIEN ENEMIES(emphasis mine), in hostile occupation, and children of diplomatic representatives of a foreign state, both of which, by the law of England and by our own law, from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America, had been recognized exceptions to the fundamental rule of citizenship by birth within the country.” – United States v Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 682, 42 L Ed 890, 902, 18 S Ct 456. Ballentine’s Law Dictionary

Congressman Beck had this to say about the War Powers Act:

“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency there is no Constitution. This means its death….But the Constitution of the United States, as a restraining influence in keeping the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power, is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes law, there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its constitutional powers.” – Congressman James Beck in Congressional Record 1933

The following are excerpts from the Senate Report, 93rd Congress, November 19, 1973, Special Committee On The Termination Of The National Emergency United States Senate. They were going to terminate all emergency powers, but they found out they did not have the power to do this so guess which one stayed in, the Emergency Act of 1933, the Trading with the Enemy Act October 6, 1917 as amended in March 9, 1933.

“Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency….Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”

“A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 (now 63) years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency….from, at least, the Civil War in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.” – Senate Report, 93rd Congress, November 19, 1973

You may be asking yourself is this the law, and if so where is it, read the following: In Title 12 U.S.C, in section 95b you’ll find the following codification of the Emergency War Powers:

“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subsection (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C., 95a), are hereby approved and confirmed.” – (March 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, 1, 48 Stat. 1)

So you can further understand the word Alien Enemy and what it means to be declared an enemy of this government, read the following definitions: The phrase Alien Enemy is defined in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary as:

One who owes allegiance to the adverse belligerent. – 1 Kent 73.

He who owes a temporary but not a permanent allegiance is an alien enemy in respect to acts done during such temporary allegiance only; and when his allegiance terminates, his hostile character terminates also; -1 B. & P.163.

Alien enemies are said to have no rights, no privileges, unless by the king’s special favor, during time of war; – 1 Bla. Com. 372; Bynkershoek 195; 8 Term 166. [Remember we’ve been under a declared state of war since October 6, 1917, as amended March 9, 1933 to include every United States citizen.]

“The phrase Alien Enemy is defined in Words and Phrases as: Residence of person in territory of nation at war with United States was sufficient to characterize him as “alien enemy” within Trading with the Enemy Act, even if he had acquired and retained American citizenship.” – Matarrese v. Matarrese, 59 A.2d 262, 265, 142 N.J. Eq. 226.

“Residence or doing business in a hostile territory is the test of an “alien enemy: within meaning of Trading with the Enemy Act and Executive Orders thereunder.” – Executive Order March 11, 1942, No. 9095, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix 6; Trading with the Enemy Act 5 (b). In re Oneida Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Utica, 53 N.Y.S. 2d. 416, 420, 421, 183 Misc. 374.

“By the modern phrase, a man who resides under the allegiance and protection of a hostile state for commercial purposes is to be considered to all civil purposes as much an `alien enemy’ as if he were born there.” – Hutchinson v. Brock, 11 Mass. 119, 122.

Am I done with the proof? Not quite, believe it or not, it gets worse. I have established that war has been declared against the American people and their children. The American people that voted for the 1933 government were responsible for Congress’ actions, because Congress was there in their proxy. What is one of the actions taken against an enemy during time of War. In the Constitution the Congress was granted the power during the time of war to grant Letters of Marque. What is a letter of Marque? Well, read the following:

A commission granted by the government to a private individual, to take the property of a foreign state, as a reparation for an injury committed by such state, its citizens or subjects. The prizes so captured are divided between the owners of the privateer, the captain, and the crew. – Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1914.

Think about the mission of the IRS, they are a private organization, or their backup, the ATF. These groups have been granted letters of Marque, read the following:

“The trading with the enemy Act, originally and as amended, in strictly a war measure, and finds its sanction in the provision empowering Congress “to declare war, grant letters of Marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water.” — Stoehr v. Wallace 255 U.S.

Under the Constitution the Power of the Government had its checks and balances, power was divided between the three branches of government. To do anything else means you no longer have a Constitutional government. I’m not even talking about the obvious which we have already covered, read the following:

“The Secretary of the Treasury and/or the Attorney General may require, by means of regulations, rulings, instructions, or otherwise, any person to keep a full record of, and to furnish under oath, in the form of reports or otherwise, from time to time and at any time or times, complete information relative to, any transaction referred to in section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917.” — Title 12 Banks and Banking page 570.

How about Clinton’s new Executive Order of June 6, 1994 where the Alphabet agencies are granted their own power to obtain money and the military if need be to protect themselves. These are un-elected officials, sounds un-Constitutional to me, but read on.

“The delegations of authority in this Order shall not affect the authority of any agency or official pursuant to any other delegation of presidential authority, presently in effect or hereafter made, under section 5 (b) of the act of October 6, 1917, as amended (12 U.S.C. 95a)”

How can the President delegate to un-elected officials power that he was elected to have, and declare that it cannot be taken away, by the voters or the courts or Congress. I tell you how, under martial law, under the War Powers Act. The American public is asleep and is unaware nor do they care about what is going on, because it may interfere with their making money. I guess Thomas Jefferson was right again:

“…And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, and give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes; have not time to think, no means of calling the mismanager’s to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow sufferers…” — (Thomas Jefferson) THE MAKING OF AMERICA, p. 395

Submitted January 28

“Lloyd Bentsen, of Texas, to be U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund for a term of 5 years; U.S. Governor of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development for a term of 5 years; U.S. Governor of the Inter-American Development Bank for a term of 5 years; U.S. Governor of the African Development Bank for a term of 5 years; U.S. Governor of the Asian Development Bank; U.S. Governor of African Development Fund; and U.S. Governor of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.” — Presidential Documents, February 1, 1993.

At the same time, Bentsen was the Secretary of Treasury. Gee, I don’t know, this sounds like a conflict of entrust and interest to me, how about you? Also, Congress is the only one under the Constitution able to appropriate money.

How about a few months ago when Secretary of Treasury Ruban sent tons of money to Mexico, without Congress’ approval. Also, Secretary of Treasury Ruban was president of the bank that made the loans to Mexico, he was then made Secretary of Treasury and paid Mexico’s debt to his bank with taxpayers money. Again, sounds like a conflict of entrust to me.

“Without limitation as to any other powers or authority of the Secretary of the Treasury or the Attorney General under any other provision of this Order, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and empowered to prescribe from time to time regulations, rulings, and instructions to carry out the purposes of this Order and to provide therein or otherwise the conditions under which licenses may be granted by or through such officers or agencies as the Secretary of the Treasury may designate, and the decision of the Secretary with respect to the granting, denial or other disposition of an application or license shall be final.” — Section 7, Title 12 U.S.C. Banks and Banking

Do the issues I have brought up sound like this is a Constitutional government to you? I have not covered the main nexus, the money. I didn’t make this information up, it is the government’s own documents and legal definitions taken from their dictionaries. I wish the hard working Americans in the government that are loyal to an American Republic could read this, the more that know the truth the better.

Originally placed on the web by James Montgomery, Knowledge is Freedom BBS, 910-869-1945, High Point North Carolina, August 27, 1995.


Admiralty Courts in Colorado?




“I believe there is something out there watching over us.
Unfortunately, it’s the government.”
Woody Allen

Patriots are subjected to much ridicule when they object to the flag that appears in every government office and courtroom in the land. That flag is the United States flag… with one seemingly minor cosmetic difference – a knotted golden fringe on three sides.

Government officials and judges adamantly refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the United States as defined in 4 U.S.C. Section 1,2, and 3 – which has NO fringe.

Why should anyone be concerned about this apparently innocent decorative feature? What difference does it make?

The difference is that the flag that is displayed is legal notice, to all who enter, of the type of law that holds jurisdiction. The constitutional United States flag signifies common law jurisdiction. The gold fringed United States flag is the Admiralty or War flag which denotes Admiralty or martial law.

Hogwash, you say? Is there no Admiralty Court claiming jurisdiction in America except in matters that occur on the high seas? Think again! Just as the founders of this country railed against the King for extending Admiralty law to the lands of the Colonies, so are those few patriots who have paid attention to the corruption of our legal system, raising a hue and a cry over the current usurpers of jurisprudence.


The Admiralty Court Exists Because

the U.S. is Under Martial law

This Awareness* wishes briefly to remind entities that the admiralty court is the court in which the gold braid goes around the American Flag which indicates the court is under martial law, or under admiralty law, from the martial law since Abraham’s Lincoln’s executive order putting it under martial law, and in order to continue staying under martial law, the country has to have some kind of war every two years. Thus, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, et cetera, and the admiralty laws are used in the courts in such a way that they are not necessarily tied to the Constitution, although the Constitution is said to be the law of the land.


This Awareness indicates that when Lincoln was assassinated, no one thought to put an end to this declaration of martial law because of the Civil War and because the martial law has continued up to this time, from the time of the Civil War, the nation can be directed by what is called Admiralty Law or martial law by simply a command of the President or the authority of the land or his agents.

It is not even required by Admiralty Law that Congress conduct proceedings to make laws. The Admiralty Law can provide statutes, which are called statutory laws, while the country is under Admiralty or martial law, but the Admiralty or martial law must come to an end eventually, in which it much either end or be reinstated. Thus, entities will find a new effort to create martial law in this country again. It may be martial law against what is termed a crime wave, even though crime has decreased two years in a row and has not increased much in the past several years.

“A country cannot be both ignorant and free…”
Thomas Jefferson

US Under Martial Law – War and The Emergency Powers

For example, they may find that a crisis lets them circumvent rules or laws that are protected by Constitutional principles so that they break the Constitution by following procedures in the activity of a disguise of helping out in a crisis. The emergency acts often set aside laws and once a law is set aside for an emergency, it may be left sitting aside.

For example, Abraham Lincoln declared martial law during the Civil War. Martial law has not been lifted yet from his declaration of martial law, over a hundred years ago. This Awareness indicates that any time entities in power want to do something that is illegal under the Constitution, they go simply ahead with it under the principle of the martial law declared by Lincoln. That is how the Executive Orders are presented. They are Executive Orders based on martial law that has not been lifted. This is also referred to as admiralty law.

Thus you have, in one period, a war on poverty. A few years later you have a war on drugs. And there are more and more of these wars occurring every two years. Otherwise, Martial Law would have to be canceled and you would be back under the Constitution, and your freedoms could be restored. You could then plead Constitutional Rights in courts of law. However, at present, the courts of law are following Admiralty Law, and therefore, if you plead Constitutional Rights in court, you are not likely to get anywhere.

Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially-proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971.

Ooooops….and here comes for your entertainment “A Letter to the Sheeple

Thus Constitutional Rights only count when you get up into the Supreme Court, for there is a tendency to continue to use the Constitutional law in the Supreme Court because they do not want the people to know that the Constitution has been superseded by Admiralty Law. This Awareness indicates that therefore, the Supreme Court will often rule if there is a constitutional discrepancy, so that the lower laws are supposed to follow the Constitution, and yet, entering into a court of law, arguing with the Constitution, seldom is beneficial to an entity because they will say the entity is in the wrong jurisdiction in this court.

They do not recognize your Constitutional Law in the jurisdiction of an Admiralty setting or court, and therefore, they will rule against you, This is the purpose of lawyers. They are clearly aware of their role in the Admiralty court, because you are not in the right jurisdiction for such.

American Patriot Friends Network:
“The Law”!
Secret Courts – Secret Law

The admiralty law, like any military law, has its own set of rules. This Awareness indicates it is also likened unto a corporation, which has its rules or laws, and when the laws of a corporation affect an entity in a way that is contrary to his or her Constitutional laws, then the entity can sue the corporation and rely on the Constitution, but this is often ignored by the corporations and most entities do not have the funds necessary to follow through to sue a corporation in order to have the Constitutional rights adjudicated.

The Federal Government in D.C. a Corporation from England

This Awareness indicates that likewise, the corporation that is the Federal government in Washington D.C., which was incorporated in the last century in London, England, which the Freeman have pointed out has its rules; these are the Federal statutes and so forth; and these too are designed for certain purposes but are required to follow the Constitution and if entities feel their Constitutional Rights have been violated by a Federal statute, they have the option of suing the Federal government and the statute for a constitutional ruling in the Supreme Court.

This Awareness indicates however, the ability to follow a case through the Supreme Court to test a Federal statute is not always easy, nor is it inexpensive. It is very costly, and very difficult and may take years. This Awareness indicates that for these reasons, the Federal statutes are extremely difficult for entities to overrun, and by carrying on the martial law in this country and using the Federal statutes as law, the Constitution becomes less and less effective, because it becomes more and more expensive to use, and therefore, gradually, over periods of time, more and more statutes and more and more corporate rules had their effect over the masses to the point where entities begin to feel that they do not have any rights, and whereby even judges in courts of law dismiss and refuse to allow constitutional points of law to occur in their courts.

The Judicial System is Really to Protect the D.C. Corporation

Why should they allow constitutional points of law in their courts when they are actually military courts? This Awareness indicates that most entities think the judicial system is there to protect the rights of entities according to the Constitution, the law of the land, the Bill of Rights and so forth, but they are really there to keep order in society and to protect those who have the power and the money and to assure that no one disturbs the infrastructure of the corporation being promoted from London or the state rules and those that are promoted by the courts as military organizations.

Courts Are Above The Constitution?

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security


The Press Works for those Who Promote the New World Order

This Awareness indicates the press of course works for the people who bring you the New World Order, who bring you the means by which this country will eventually be enslaved, and the press ins not going to promote clear and honest reporting on these kind of of issues. There are things from the Internet, that give some clear reporting. This Awareness indicates that in general, however, most people will only receive what the world planners want them to know, and therefore, they are not likely to get the full story.

A stroke of a Pen Could Create Martial Law
(Revelations of Awareness 94-5)

This Awareness indicates that this could occur at the stroke of a pen when the Constitution is discarded under martial law, which could occur any day that it is decided. This Awareness indicates that as soon as the people are disarmed, the martial law that has been in existence in this country since Lincoln will be publicly exposed and people will realize they no longer can use Constitutional claims, freedom, rights, and so forth, as a defense, and that they have no right to bear arms, they have no right to congregate, they have no freedom of speech, they have no rights in the courts of law to a fair trial by their peers.

They have no rights to prevent their homes from being searched. This Awareness indicates that the major block to martial law being announced is that there are some 70 million gun owners. Many of these entities being upright citizens and business people who do not consider it the business of government to enter in their homes, to take their weapons, and therefore, they are a danger to anyone who would violate the rights as given by the Constitution.

In other words the Federal government does not want the people to know yet they are under martial law, or that they are not protected by the Constitution for fear that if they were to discover this, it could start a civil war directed at the Federal government from this army of 70 million people, for there are only 3 million armed people in the military and police force in this country at this time.


“Government” working for the Rothschilds

(Revelations of Awareness 94-8)

This Awareness indicates that in a country where freedom of speech and other freedoms are allowed, entities have been killed for expressing or pursuing those freedoms. It is because this country is out of control in terms of the type of government, and who the government really is working for, because this government has not been working for the people for some time.

It has been working for the Rothschilds and other international bankers in their effort to create a New World Government, run by the United Nations, which is a Rothschild organization, which is an international banking organization. It is basically owned by the international bankers, established by them, set up by them, and influenced and basically controlled by them..

On Timarchy and the Usurper’s Machineries

This Awareness indicates that it is time for the people to reclaim their inalienable rights that were given to them by the Divine, and handed to them through laws of the United States Constitution, the Magna Carta, and other documents from antiquity and historical situations wherein mankind fought, suffered, and died to win these freedoms.

Government’s “Crime Prevention”-
just another new way to confiscate the guns from U.S. citizens

This Awareness indicates in other words, the government has gotten into Crime prevention, by making the planning or the attempt to cause a crime a crime in itself. This Awareness indicates that this is also part of the reasoning behind the anti-gun movement, in which government sees that anyone having a gun, wherein the Constitution gives entities the right to bear arms, the government is saying: “If we take away the guns, they cannot commit the crime, thus it is Crime Prevention. If we make it a crime to have the guns, then we make it a crime in a way that prevents crime from occurring.”

Thus, getting into Crime Prevention may go against the Constitution of the United states, but it would be to the benefit of the New World Order to be able to call any kind of potential violence a crime. They could even go further and restrict knives or bows and arrows, but this is not likely to occur. The ownership of bows and arrows however might eventually become a crime, because generally bows and arrows would be considered potentially violent in their use.

This Awareness indicates in other words, by creating a set of laws to prevent an entity from having the ability to commit a crime, is making it so that entities do not have to take responsibility for themselves. They only obey and are taken care of by the government and its laws. The Constitution put the burden on the individual to be a good citizen, whereas the New World Order is putting the burden on the individual to give up freedoms and to obey the government and its statutes and laws that do not guarantee freedoms.

This Awareness indicates the Constitution was concerned about the judgments and laws of King George and of government itself, and made it such that the people were in charge of the government. The Constitution was there to serve the people against an unruly tyrannical government to ensure that the government would never be able to set up a totalitarian control over the masses.

This has been more or less neutralized, negated, and made obsolete, though they still pretend the Constitution has power. The agencies, particularly the Justice Branch of government and the executive Branch have total control over the people at this time. If a case is brought to a courthouse anywhere in the United States, and an entity attempts to use the Constitution as the arguments for protection, they will get nowhere in the effort, because the courts are not operating under the Constitution. They are operating under martial law, and as continued to the present.


Rocky Mountain News Wed. May 22, 1996 Legal Notices Section

The legal notices here displayed concern property seized by Federal agents as booty under Admiralty law. Notice is required so that anyone who might have an interest in the property seized has opportunity to seek to protect his interest.
One would not be wise to attempt this, though. Most likely, any excuse will be used to allege that the party claiming interest in the property was a party to the alleged offense that resulted in the original seizure.

The allegation is enough to justify the taking of property – under Admiralty law guilt is presumed. The claimant might well lose other property not yet in the hands of these landgoing pirates, even though no actual conviction of any offense is ever entered. Check your local paper’s legal notices. Look into the cases cited and see if any conviction occurs – or if any charges were even filed – against the persons whose property was seized.

Colorado is a long ways from the ocean. Admiralty law is farther still from the common law recognized under Federal and State constitutions.

You decide… are these patriots kooks? Or have we been blind to the tyranny that is even now upon us?



Case on Point
JUDGE: Bail is set at $50,000.
(for a previous case)
Judge to Bailiff….Next case….
************************************************************ BALIFF: —- People vs.“SMITH”.
(in upper case letters)
 The charges are two counts of operating houses of ill-repute:3 Counts of armed robbery;2 Counts of murder in the 1st degree;5 Counts of indecent exposure while dancing in the rain and30 Counts of bigamy.JUDGE:
(he sees the strawman’s name “SMITH” in his file, and that’s how he is addressing him)
 —- State your name. —-THE ACCUSED Smith: —– Your Honor, I will be glad to state my name if you can show me any presentments with my name on it for me to accept. —-JUDGE: —- Accept? —- What are you talking about? —–THE ACCUSED Smith: —– The court is looking for an ACCEPTOR, as the PRINCIPAL has the primary obligation to pay or discharge any instrument presented for acceptance.See ACCEPTANCE under 3-410 of the Uniform Commercial Code.JUDGE: — Mr. you are accused of some very serious crimes. —- Now how do you plead?THE ACCUSED Smith: I will plead guilty to the facts, but not the crimes, but first I need to make sure there is an ACCEPTANCE BOND.JUDGE: What do you want a bond for?THE ACCUSED Smith: Whoever filed the complaint is making a CLAIM on me and in the Jurisdiction of Admiralty you can not make a CLAIM unless you BOND your CLAIM.JUDGE: Well what about that prosecutor? PROSECUTER: I’m not sure about that…no, no bond.THE ACCUSED Smith: What about a BID BOND? Do you have the bid bond?JUDGE:
(pretending not to know)
What’s that?
THE ACCUSED Smith: — [Because] A BID BOND is what gets [then] filled out and if the defendant(or accused) does not close, settle, pay or discharge the claim he defaults or dishonors the court. The BIDBOND, PERFORMANCE BOND and PAYMENT BOND gets sold to the U.S. District Court where these bonds are bought up by Insurance Companies and then sold on the open market, mainly to the Japanese and Chinese, which becomes the primary [collateral] source of our economy.JUDGE: Oh, —– THAT BID BOND.
(acting as if he had inadvertently forgot about that)
 PROSECUTER: Judge this is ridiculous. This man is charged with multiple counts of crimes and the state is asking for the max .JUDGE: What about sir?THE ACCUSED Smith: —- Your honor, is this a TORT action or a COMMERCIAL CRIME?If it’s a TORT, then where is the INJURED PARTY or if it’s a COMMERCIAL CRIME, then where isthe CONTRACT? PROSECUTER: Your honor, this is an outrage!!! This guy is accused of murder.JUDGE: — NO…… HE IS NOT!—- Prosecutor… You have no CLAIM against him.—- It isn’t his responsibility to BOND YOUR CLAIM(S).—- Sir…..You’re free to go…
A BID Bond
BID BOND(Under $100K)Application: This bond guarantees that if bid of principal is low, they will enter into a contract andfile a Performance Bond.BID BOND(Over $100K)Application: This bond guarantees that if bid of principal is low, they will enter into a contract and file a Performance Bond.
Payment & Performance Bond
PAYMENT BOND(Under $100K) Application:A payment bond is given by a contractor to guarantee payment, subject to the bond terms, for………………………, which he/she is obligated to perform under the contract. This liability maybe contained in the performance bond, in which case a separate labor and material bond(payment bond) is not issued.PAYMENT BOND(Under $100K) Application:A payment bond is given by a contractor to guarantee payment, subject to the bond terms, for………………………, which he/she is obligated to perform under the contract. This liability maybe contained in the performance bond, in which case a separate labor and material bond(payment bond) is not issued.PERFORMANCE BOND(Under $100K)Application: The Contract Performance Bond is given by a contractor to an owner guarantees that they will faithfully perform the terms and conditions of a written contract.PERFORMANCE BOND(Under $100K)Application: The Contract Performance Bond is given by a contractor to an owner guarantees that they will faithfully perform the terms and conditions of a written contract.
Admiralty Bond
Application:Miscellaneous&Personal Financial  Court bonds filed in connection with litigation under maritime law
Profiteering off the prisoners / Prime stockholders in Correction Corp. of America / Funding Streams Exposed / Corporate Public Private Scheme Exploiting, Criminalizing Vulnerable People Research and excerpts from LETTERS FROM JAIL From: Lynn SchmaltzI had many opportunities to educate women on the monetary system of jail. The moment an order iswritten, whether it’s a warrant or a traffic ticket, or whatever, the money machine is activated. Every prisoner has a monetary value to our government whether its local, county, state or federal. Bonds are written based on the person’s name and social security number and are sold through a brokerage firm such as AG Edwards or Merrill Lynch who has the contract to sell all the prison bonds for the city, county,state or federal prisons. Over 50% of the money market bonds right now are purchased in Japan or China.I’ve been told by researchers that Wal-Mart and, used to be, Kmart also purchase these bonds, Wal-Martmostly doing so by emptying out bank accounts at night. Both companies are fronts for enormous money machines.The way the bond works is that a monetary value is placed on the alleged crime and then factored the way banks factor their money. In other words if a person is convicted of a felony the ‘value’ would be $4million. The county/city/ state then multiplies it by ten, so the bond that goes out for sale with th prisoner’s name and social security number is a short-term ‘promissory’ note. It’s offered at $40 million.Perhaps an investor will offer 40% of the $40 million, or $16 million. Once this ‘promissory note’ of the face value of $40 million reaches the banks it is then multiplied again by 200 to 300% and sold as bank securities. For those of you who wonder why the US has more people in prison per capita than any other nation on earth, you’ll begin to understand how we can have a weakening economy and still fund wars overseas. It’s all based on prisoners….in other words, prison for profit.Knowing all this and knowing that a prisoner can have a ‘net worth’ of say, $10,000 per day in the money markets, helped me explain to many bewildered women why they were in jail. We were only merchandise in a warehouse. The storage was pretty cheap; one woman while in jail researched the cost of feeding prisoners per day which ranged from 74 cents to $2.72 per prisoner per day.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: “Lynn Schmaltz”Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:46 AMSubject: Re: Paine Webber”OWNERS OF THE PRISON SYSTEM IN AMERICA”*Owners of the Prison Systems in America* CORRECTION CORP OF AMERICA head quartered in Nashville, Tennessee owns all private prison systems in AMERICA and are selling the commercial paper.How it Works: A bid bond is done on Form 24, which comes out of the GSA Office (General Services Administration which is out of GAO (General Accounting Office} which is under the Comptroller General. This Blake Bond Bid Bond is promulgated at the time the social security card is issued. When you are arrested the bond is filled out and they issue a Performance Bond, which is done from Form 25,and then they do a Payment Bond, which is a Form 25A.The Bonds are being underwritten by the Banks. This is where the PAINE WEBBER GROUP comes in.The Plaintiff in all criminal tax cases in the USA is the PAINE WEBBER GROUP as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is a group of international businesses. The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is providing the Securities for the prisons and is selling the Bonds, and the Banks, The ABA (AMERICAN BANKING ASSOCIATION) like LEHMEN BROTHERS, in New York City, are the underwriters on the Bonds. The Banks (the underwriters) is where the money is originally coming from.A six digit tracking number is issued for the Certificate of Stocks in the Commodity and Security Exchange in the USA by CUSIP (seewww.cusip.comandwww.cjts.com the law enforcement tracking software) and a nine digit number (called Ordnance Number) is issued for the Certificate of Stocks going internationally to ANNA (Lynn’s note: see link for ANNA which is in Brussels, Belgium at www.cusip.com). These Securities are sold through the Commodity and Security Exchange. The bottom line is they are selling stocks in the prison system. The jails are referred to as Warehouses and the prisoners are called Goods (oops, Lynn had it ‘wrong’….she told the ladies in Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center that we were in the Warehouse and we were the ‘Merchandise’ which explained the many flimsy reasons many of the ladies were in the prison…..it was just business, and just revenue). They are selling the Goods or the Account as Chattel, and as Commercial Paper on the Stock Exchange. Reminds one of the days when slaves were bought and sold on the auction block!The PAINE WEBBER GROUP is the prime stockholder in this CCA (Correction CORP of America).(Lynn’s note: the transport company who transported her to Colorado in a van with 16 other prisoners being transported about had the words “Transport Corporation of America….Nashville, Tennessee.”Transport rides are also called ‘diesel therapy’ by those who know about them.} However twenty of the largest companies such as WAL-MART; EXON; GENERAL MOTORS; FORD MOTORS; CHEVY;TEXICO; CITY CORP; IBM; EXPHILIP; HEWLETT PACKARD; VERIZON; UNITED POSTAL SERVICE (UPS); and etc. are also involved as well as other stock holding corporations (There are sixteen pages of the names of corporations that hold these stocks amounting to billions of [dollars].) Of course the monies generated is all off budget with no accounting to the People, even though the CORRECTION CORP OF AMERICA through the PAINE WEBBER GROUP is acting in the capacity of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: Promotes Privatization of the Prison System.Paul Weybrick (may be miss spelled) runs what is called the FREE CONGRESS FOUNDATION, which

owns the AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL. THE REASON FOUNDATION and THE CORNELL COMPANY are involved as well.The following are notes I wrote after Paul and I were released from Colorado on August 20, 2004. Right now there are many forms of jail in the US–actual jail, CCP ankle bracelet, transport jail, probation,parole………they all generate income:Paul and I were released on Friday on personal recognizance and allowed to go to New Mexico. We have a hearing in CO on Sept 13, 04. We got home Sat. night and have been doing catch up here at home today. I’ll write an update on Monday or Tuesday. I will especially have some words about the very heinous prison transport system in our country. For now suffice it to say that it took 20 hours in a prison van with 16 prisoners to get from Albuquerque to Hot Sulphur Springs, normally a 8 or 9 hour trip. All of us rode in hand cuffs and shackles the entire trip. There were 3 stops for McDonald’s ‘food.’ No one but the officers got off the van unless they were being dropped off. No exercise at any point. No movement allowed but to use the porta-potty on board. Cattle being transported across country are generally treated better. I talked with a man who’d been on transport from California to Colorado since July 8, 04. My transport date was August 11, 04. Someone in the Midwest told me he knew of a prisoner being transported for six months and occasionally dropped off in a county jail somewhere to await a different transport van. It’s my understanding that once you’re a prisoner in the system, the county/agency holding you is floating bond for $10,000 per day with your name and your bar code (Soc. sec. #) and these bonds are bundled periodically and sold through Merrill Lynch, AG Edwards, etc. for each state.Prison for profit……..it’s not just baloney and white bread. More later and thanks for keeping up your daily news. Paul was released from CCP (ankle bracelet) in Albuquerque and allowed to drive up to Hot Sulphur where he spent another 3 days in jail (my time over the summer has been 5 days in May, 18 days in June-July, 15 days in August and on house arrest, bond from May 24 to June 25, and ankle bracelet from mid-July to August 5, 04). Thankfully, Paul with all his transplant medications, diabetes medications, was in from May 19-24, 04. The rest of the time he was on bond or ankle bracelet house arrest. I doubt he’d have survived a prolonged transport situation. The alleged crime? “Influencing a public office” and “filing a false document.” This is what they called our UCC1 financing statement sent when we informed public officials there would be a fee for using our copyrighted property (PAULSCHMALTZ and PATRICIA SCHMALTZ), which they did anyway.And, of course, there were no repercussions for those officials when they held a fraudulent, unpublished sale our home/business on the court house steps, etc. As you well know there is no remedy in the courts of any kind. They completely ignored our sovereign status with Little Shell Pembina and Apostille with the sovereignty filed by cancel latura.Lynn Schmaltz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  I just found the notes on Jack Smith and Gene Keating’s research on prisoner bonds (not the kind you bailout with).www.cjts.com is the criminal justice tracking system software which shows the software that metro police departments use. Go to the user manual and it takes to 2% appearance bond fees. Then go to special operating software for courtrooms and it shows you how the 2% appearance bond fees are tied to the defendant’s account. Go to the bottom in the original user’s manual and it says, “Fine accounting.”Further up the page is assessments. it shows how it’s all tracked from beginning to end. FONTDIVA caller wrote to a court once and send, “Send me a complete accounting of my case.” It came back showing a $90,000 active security and they said, “Your paperwork has been forwarded to the Department of Justice.” The caller wrote a week later and said, “Send me a final pay-off amount for all my money.What would there be after 18 years without any fees, fines and interest.”They said, “We sent all your stuff to the Department of Justice. Go to GOTO BUTTON BM_3_www.cjts.comand you’ll see all there is to see about a public witness. The caller downloaded it. Roger Elvick had written something about stock exchange transactions.Once you get the bond you are creditor in fact. Alan comes on the phone call with Jack Smith who had studied Roger Elvick’s stuff intensely. He understands marketing accounts and the courts. Roger had said,”We have to find a way to track the account.” The caller on Jack’s program grabbed the phone book and just randomly picked a brokerage company …….AG Edwards. He called up to talk to a broker. Caller says he’s trying to figure something out. If there was someone trading bonds in the bond market in the caller’s name without his permission could he track the account. AG Edwards broker says they would have to have a social security number or a driver’s license number. Caller says he knows someone who was trading in Roger Elvick’s name. Broker asked if it was a friend, family member or corporation? Caller said to the broker it was a corporation. Broker then said every bond has a cusip #……..Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Process Number.You can go to www.cusip.com. There are two main outlets — Chicago and New York. You’d have to find out who their transfer agents are and then you could track the trade. You can even find out if funds are being embezzled off the account.When the cop gives you a ticket and you go into court, the judge is using this as a credit item to trade in the markets and he’s doing calls. What if someone went in and caught them short on the margin call?The broker at AG Edwards knew what the caller was talking about. He said, “IF you want to follow this up anymore, you’ll have to go to the Securities Exchange division in your state. So, the next thing the caller did was check the Department of Financial Institution of his state on the web and looked up securities exchange division. The advisory committee showed AG Edwards was the transfer agent for the state, making all the bond trades.The cop does all the paper work in the car. He is creating the assessment and the paperwork in his car when he makes out the ticket by using name, social security number, and driver’s license number. They assume you voluntarily gave it to the cop and make the trade. Every cop is a private business contractor working for the corporation. If this is true then you can follow up on every trade made in your name on your exemption. Find the bond written on your birth certificate. Use that and access your exemption through the stock market that way.
Roger Elvick knew this. The transfer and transfer agent and the number with social security number and every case number will be listed. Every traffic ticket will be listed. Broker says if Ameritrade had a trade he could track it, but he can’t track AG Edwards, and others. It’s going to take someone higher up. The brokers are enslaved by their industry. When you have a job your company is using your social security number.They’ll keep taking your exemption even if you leave that company. AG Edwards sells the prisoner/traffic bonds for several states. How does this correlate with admiralty? Jack Smith says that in admiralty the vessels are carrying commodities and goods. So they carry invoices, packing slips and bills of lading.Warrants and securities back up the goods. Lag–goods that float on the water. Gene Keating says that Title 46 is the shipping code in admiralty. Secretary of Transportation is the receiver of the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES — section 1247 Title 46–he’s the receiver and trustee. He’s talking about the carriage of goods sea act which is Title 46 in the appendix. Bills of lading are all documents of title–warrants and documents are all under the UCC and deal with documents of title. Title 46 Sections 181-189–admiralty is very complex. Even judges are taught on a need to know basis. Appellate judges often don’t know all this.This all leads to different aspects of admiralty/maritime law, both inside and outside the courtroom. The carriage of goods act, Title 46, is all governed by the Secretary of Transportation–the Coast Guard,Secretary of Commerce and the treasury are all under Secretary of Transportation and it’s all in commerce. The Secretary of transportation is the head of the maritime commission. All vessels are registered under Title 46, Section 31-301 which talks about maritime liens that arise by operation of law.There’s a maritime lien commission. The Secretary of Transportation is running everything because we are all on the ‘highway of commerce’–the water came inland, so to speak, and now it’s here under the law of trust. Everyone who comes into the courtroom is a ward in admiralty–a ward of the court. We’re in an”in rem” proceeding in admiralty in a title dispute and we have to come in as the title holder or have interest or claim in the subject matter of the complaint, or we are the ‘vessel’ and they have arrested ‘the vessel.’We’re not in common law in the courts, we’re in admiralty and they get jurisdiction by arresting the vessel. They (lawyers/district attorneys/law enforcement) don’t use the proper process and they need to trick, cajole, deceive, pressure us to do whatever they need to do and have us make a mistake to give them’in personam jurisdiction’ over us when we take on the attributes of a general appearance to the subject matter of the pleadings against the defendant “in rem” and we start acting in any capacity on the merits of the charges or by taking on the persona of the defendant vessel ‘in rem.’ There’s lots more to this, but I think you get the gist about ‘prisons for profit.’In tying this all together it would appear that there are many laggard souls, some are incarcerated in prison and some are working in the prisons. And many, many more are indifferent to what is going on in our country as far as prisons and prisoners are concerned. When I explained my case to women, many said,“Why do you bother trying to change things? To stand up to the system?” I’d always explain to them the concept of our earth trying to ascend to higher consciousness and take all the souls along, even the laggard souls. I’d explain how we could use the light of the angels, masters and God through us as flashlights …..The source for this bulletin is Ed Brannum of Texas and this message was appended to his email:
I do not have a problem you with giving out my email address. All the Feds have known it for years. It’shard trying to teach those PERSONS while they are monitoring me.”The following message is for any/all Corporate Agents/informants/investigators et. al. working incollusion by monitoring my mail and any other communications without my permission.””I sui juris, a republic of Texas National American Sovereign neutral non-combatant by law declare to allCorporate combatant FEDERAL and/or STATE Agents and/or 3rd parties that I am not a Corporationand/or UNITED STATES/STATE Created Fiction and I am accepting all Oaths and Affirmationsdeclared Under Penalties of Perjury “so help me God” and returning any/all actions from the same beingbrought/sought against me for want of Geographical Jurisdiction and Venue.””I bless God my creator and ask His blessings and Protection for the Land of Texas against alltrespassers.”
NOTICE: Information served herein is for educational purposes only,no liability assumed for use. The information you obtain in thispresentation is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Authordoes not consent to unlawful action. Author advocates andencourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all lawwhich is particularly applicable. If anything in this presentation isfound to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it intimely fashion upon notification.VOID where prohibited by law.
NOTICE : Information served herin is for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use. The Information you obtain in this presentation is not, nor is it intended  to be, legal advice. Author does not consent to unlawful action. Author Advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable. If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. VOID  Where Prohibited by law.

Courts Are Above The Constitution?

     ICE wrote: Interesting logic. Rights predate the Constitution, but then so do the courts; thus court rulings prior to the Constitution overrule it?!? Well, as long as they have smart bombs and plenty of MJTF units, I guess DOJ can say whatever it pleases. ICE From: ” Distribution@Vigo-Examiner.com ” Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 23:28:56 +0000 Subject: DOJ Confides Disloyalty to US Const. by WILLIAM MICHAEL KEMP minutemn@internetpro.net The Vigo Examiner In December 1997, the Unites States Department of Justice received a letter from a group which put forward the position that the right to keep and bear arms was a right held by individuals, predated the Constitution, and was simply affirmed and guaranteed by the second Article of the Bill of Rights, not granted by it. Recently they got their reply, having waited only three months. In a letter dated March 18, 1998, the Department of Justice (DOJ), in the person of James S. Reynolds, Chief of the Terrorism and Violent Crime Section, answered this assertion with a listing of citations of case law, as handed down by the Supreme Court and various U.S. Courts of Appeal over the last sixty years. In these cites, it is asserted that the Constitution does not grant a right to individuals to own and use firearms. All appeared well. The DOJ was in agreement. Not quite. The DOJ went on to assert that because the Constitution is not the source of rights, that at least one of the rights it guarantees does not exist. Reynolds asserts that these court decisions supercede the Constitution, and that the right does not exist because the courts have said it does not exist, regardless of what the Constitution says on the matter. The reply concludes by quoting from a letter from Mary C. Lawton, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, to George Bush, Chairman, Republican National Committee (July 19, 1973): “…it must be considered as settled that there is no personal constitutional right, under the Second Amendment, to own or use a gun.” Mr. Reynolds further confides that this loyalty to the courts, not the Constitution is the position of the current Department of Justice, and that this position has long been held by the Department under both Democratic and Republican administrations. Gun control activists have expressed their satisfaction over this position, and state their intention to further press for limits on individual freedom to and use of firearms. Several have noted, however, that the blunt statement expressed in this letter from the Department of Justice will likely infuriate the legions of American gun rights activists, and may well make the slow, steady elimination of firearms from personal possession all the more difficult. Gun rights activists also take the position that the Constitution “grants” no rights whatsoever. They cite Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, wherein Jefferson states that men “…are endowed by their Creator” with rights, and that therefore, the Constitution is only the government’s solemn written contract to preserve the preexisting rights. Some say this point is blatantly contradicted in the Department of Justice letter, and by several of the case law cites which are invoked to support their position. These gun rights adherents further cite the wording of the Bill of Rights itself, which states in part that “..the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” They note that where the phrase “the people” is used in all other parts of the Constitution, it invariably and inarguably means, and is universally accepted as “the collection of individual Americans.” Strict Constitutional constructionists, they attack the Justice Department’s reliance on case law, and claim that the Department of Justice’s reliance upon “the Courts'” opinions is akin to the defendants at Nuremberg (war criminals trials after World War II) claiming to be “following orders,” and point out that each Constitutional officer is required to swear an individual oath to the Constitution, not the courts. They say that Article VI of the Constitution requires strict adherence by all legislative, executive, and judicial officers to the Constitution, not the courts. They further cite Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence, pointing out that this foundation of American government requires that the people alter or abolish any government which fails to support the premise of individual rights, subsequently guaranteed by the Constitution. They allege that any judge (or any government employee) who has taken the position that government is not absolutely bound to support individual rights over the delegated power of government is in violation of their oath of office, and has thus vacated their office and their authority. The Department of Justice’s position is currently demonstrated in several situations present in the news, most recently in the arrest of several men in Michigan, accused of possessing what the Department of Justice refers to as “illegal firearms.” One of the firearms in question is called, by government attorneys, a “sniper rifle accurate to over a mile.” At least one of the defendants in that case is alleging in his defense that there is no such thing as an “illegal firearm” when possessed by a free American. A gun rights and citizens’ militia activist was interviewed at a shooting range, and prior to the interview, used a bolt action rifle with telescopic sights to demonstrate the accuracy of the firearm. From a sandbagged position, he fired several shots in succession at targets not visible to the naked eye at the considerable distance covered. Upon examination, several soft drink bottle caps and brass shell casings were observed with bullet holes through them. He referred to the firearm as “a deer rifle.” The man, who spoke with the assurance of anonymity, scoffed at the promised anonymity. “They know who I am,” he stated. When questioned who “they” were, he replied “the government– or, I should say, their secret police.” Pushed for an explanation, he pointed out that this reporter had no difficulty in locating a spokesman for the gun activists’ viewpoint. He further pointed out that he was routinely contacted at home by various representatives of the media. He then asserted that government employees were indeed anonymous, removed from the citizenry over whom they allege control, and that they were following the same path embarked upon by representatives of King George in colonial times in the effort to further their unlawful control over the citizenry. This gentleman asserted that the founders of the United States pointedly affirmed the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, ascribed the success of the revolution against England to the armed citizenry, and trumpeted the American government as being qualitatively different from all the other governments of the world, in that the government not only trusted the citizenry to be armed, but in fact depended upon the citizens’ armament to maintain their hard-won freedom. “King George assumed the power to disarm Americans, and his representatives attempted to exercise that power,” he stated. “That government was proven to be in error.” Not all gun rights activists, however, are so alienated by the actions and attitude of the DOJ. The National Rifle Association, a long time supporter of law enforcement, successfully lobbied for passage of HR 666 in January of 1995. This law allows warrantless search and seazure. Some have alleged that it has completely compromised the Fourth Amendment. The Department of Justice maintains the position stated in the referenced letter.

Copyright (c) 1998, The Vigo Examiner


by Leslie A. Lummis,
Guma Trankilidad, J-5,
Tamuning, Guam 96911

As written by Lee Brobst, and as published by the Duck Club News Digest, Stockton, California in October 1983, in a report entitled “The Alarm is Ringing”.

“The Federal District Courts are the only courts in the country that have jurisdiction in Limited Liability (cases) for the Payment of Debts. Everytime you are hauled into a Federal District Court on a tax matter,..or what you think is a tax matter,..the judge issues a decision, and expands upon the Maritime Law.

While you are involved in Maritime Law, if you are damaged by a seaman, you cannot collect damages due you caused by a seaman. This is the reason why people who file civil rights suits against the IRS and judges get shot down.

The required report method? You lose because of failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. You are a seaman aboard spaceship Earth trying to redress a right, but you have no rights when you’re involved in National Credit.

Once you understand the maritime law and how it works everything falls right into place including the Internal Revenue Service. In maritime law they have what is called double insurance. Its very common because of the complexity of the goods carried on each ship they make sure there are two insurance policies so if one should fail the other will take its place. The first insurance policy is Social Security and the second one is the Income Tax.

Quoting Mr. Brobst, “Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts works like this: I heard there was a man in Missouri by the name of Layne Crist who had left his beans in a grain elevator for storage. When the elevator announced bankruptcy, Crist went to the elevator to get his beans out. The elevator people said he couldn’t take them out but Crist forcefully removed them anyway, whereupon the Elevator prosecuted him. They could do so because Crist no longer owned the beans!

They had been stored in a commune,..an elevator in which there were multiple demands on stored property. So when Crist went back for his beans he was arrested for stealing property. The reason? That property belonged to the Commune,..that is to everybody that deals in the public National Credit. He enjoyed Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts.

There was another thing that Crist didn’t know. He never owned the beans in the first place because he was involved in Public National Credit and he got a loan to grow the beans,..so there was a lien on the beans before they came up out of the ground.

Now he also owns a tractor. That is he thinks he owns a tractor, but whenever you can;t perform on a loan everything you have becomes pledge for your activity. So, in such a case ,..one really “owns” nothing! One becomes a feudal serf upon the land.

The minute you quit performing the authorities will confiscate everything you own and eject you from the land. That is the “CON” game they have going under the IRS Federal Reserve System!

To free yourself from these restrictions, imposed under the Maritime (Admiralty jurisdiction) , you would have to sever yourself from Social Security, liquidate your home mortgage, give up banks accounts, and liquidate all loans. Everything that ties you in to the Public National Credit. Otherwise everything you make, or will make, becomes a common pledge to the national security while you’re on a “joint venture for profit”.

Now perhaps you can understand how you can be involved under the Federal system, which ties you in with “Maritime” Laws and subjects you to “Admiralty” jurisdiction under the law.

For banks, Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts works like this. Let’s say that you owe me $10,000, and you have $10,0000 in a savings bank but the bank collapses. You think you’re OK because the bank has FDIC to protect you. But the Bank relies on Limited Liability for the Payment of Debts and the insurance company that operates under Limited Liability is the FDIC and for every dollar you have in the bank there is only 1/2 cent available upon demand. So if you have $10,000 in the bank you can’t pay me, and I can’t pay my bills either.

Quoting from Mr Brobst:

The IRS Tax Court is a court of insurance right out of British law. It is called a ‘Court of Insurance’ in Blackstone’s Commentaries, Vol 3 or 4.

Our Federal District Court judges are set up as judges of Maritime law. Once you get into this and understand it, you will see how the Federal District Courts work. Maritime law was separate from the rest of the court system. When you went into a maritime court the papers you received there stated in the caption at the top “IN ADMIRALTY”.

I found out from Benders Federal Practices manual, Vol 1, that the hiding of Admiralty law started in 1966. At that time, our courts joined admiralty with other law forms, so if you went into court on whatever type of case, whether In Equity, common law, or some other form you would not know or be told that your case would be in “Admiralty”, but it would be switched into Admiralty without your knowledge. Thus you no longer know what is going on in the Federal courts.

In Maritime Law , your insurance is good for a year at a time, just as the IRS asks for payment of their “insurance premium”, a year at a time. You have to re-program your mind to think: “insurance” in place of “income tax”. We are not dealing with real money today,backed with gold or silver…We are dealing with maritime law and credit, and this is something you must remember.

When people revoke their marriage licenses they have a common law marriage and the State loses its jurisdiction over them. That is one way of beating the community property laws.

Twenty years after enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, on June 5, 1933, during a Banking Holiday which lasted for three weeks Congress enacted HJR-192 to suspend the gold standard and abrogate the gold clause in contracts.

This resolution declared that “Whereas the holding or dealing in gold affect the public interest, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; and whereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions or obligations which purport to give the oblige a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency,..are inconsistent with the declared policy of Congress,..in the payment of debts.

This resolution thereby declared that any obligation requiring “payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and, Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, shall be “discharged” upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.”

Note that the words do not talk about “payment” of debt, but clearly states that “Every obligation,..shall be discharged.” Once we understand the facts, a light comes on with regard to our understanding of what has been, and is, going on in our courts.

Every court in the land is operating under the jurisdiction of Admiralty, and in this jurisdiction, among other things:

(1) The jury if there is one, is merely advisor to the chancellor (judge),
(2) The advisory jury must see and hear only the evidence that the judge must see and hear only the evidence that the judge permits,
(3) The Advisory jury must take the law as the judge dictates it to them;
(4) Substantive common law (Bill of rights) is not cognizable,
(5) There is Limited Liability for Payment of Debt,
(6) There are no such things as rights, only privileges,
(7) Performance is compelled for receiving benefits from privilege.

Proceeding with the observations of Mr. Lee Brobst:

I am now going to take you back in time to 1933. Because there was an Act of Congress known as HJR 192 that suspended our gold standard. What this did was to forbid the American people to pay their debts at law. The only thing we have been able to do since then isto SKIP paying our debts! When you cannot pay your debts at law you are put into the jurisdiction of “limited capacity” which limits you from performing an act,..and this is you are prevented from paying debts. What happened in 1933 is this: When Congress suspended our National money system they opened the flood gates for Maritime Law to come inland, into situations formerly dominated bycommon law.

Now the founding fathers set up two jurisdictions for us in this country. One was the Maritime Law and the other was the Common Law for local use of the states. So when Congress suspended the gold standard they thereby released Maritime Law into land areas formerly dominated by Common Law. The effect was to destroy what is called the “allodial land title” which is the substance of common law.

In 1933 we went into instant “bankruptcy” or “receivership” to the private Federal Reserve Corporation. All of \our money went into the hands of a private group of bankers who are the stockholders of the Federal Reserve,..the central bankers from Europe, in cooperation with some of our own.

So what happened is this: The bankers started creating check book money over our land title which means that this involvement which has taken place since 1933 changed America from a common law “allodial” system into a common law feudal system.

Upon the total bankruptcy of America the powers that be who own the Federal Reserve System will foreclose on the U.S. Treasury. In the process they will have turned the U.S. into a private profit making corporation for their exclusive benefit, and you will be but a serf in their employ.

An insurable interest, under Maritime, triggers a multiple of things, such as: the liability for a State Income Tax, a County Income Tax, a right to work tax etc. It triggers additional insurance policies to protect an “insurable interest” under Maritime.

When we plead a tax case in court, we think we are pleading taxes, but the judge takes a different view of it, that it is a matter of insurance in a Maritime contract, and that it heretofore comes under “Admiralty” jurisdiction and procedures.

Under Maritime Law we are responsible for any loss which occurs while involved in maritime commerce. Under the common law which prevailed prior to this case (1948) we were responsible for our debts. If you and I own a ship and we want to transport goods to Japan, we solicit people to ship goods with us. Three days out of port we are hit by a severe storm which damaged goods on board our ship.

Under the common law We would have been responsible for the loss of goods on board. The shippers saw this as a threat to maritime shipping so they induced Congress to pass a law which is called “The Public Liability Statute”, which was passed on March 3, 1851. So, as a result the ship owners are now exempt and the shippers are responsible for their goods, under maritime law.

Now in 1933 when we lost our public National money system, we were all thrown into national bankruptcy under law and insurance. When you are involved in maritime law all your property, including the shirt on your back is a common pledge for the security of everyone concerned.

In years past it was too dangerous to ship money. The maritime law supplied the credit system to replace money,..a credit system which has to deal with bills, notes and checks as we have today. So this is the modern way,..bills, notes and checks, simply paper, called “money”. All this is legal under authority of mercantile law under “Admiralty” jurisdiction.

According to Mr Brobst, the foreclosure of America by the Federal Reserve System will occur when the debt becomes so large that we can no longer pay the interest, or the interest exceeds the principal. According to Mr Brobst, at that time the powers behind the Fed will own all the land titles and we will all be but serfs upon the land we once owned.

Finally, having introduced you to the implications of Admiralty laws, as described by Mr Brobst, we encourage you to research some ofour writings which describe why we must replace the fictitious so-called “Federal” Reserve System, with an Association of States, thereby reasserting our control over our future, whereby we become tax-free once again.


Leslie A. Lummis,
Guma Trankilidad,
Tamuning, Guam 96911

Thank you for your interest..and patience…Les



(( MIRROR ENENEWS.COM ** SEPT. 09, 2012))


12:32 PM EST on September 9th, 2012 | 41 comments
03:18 AM EST on September 9th, 2012 | 14 comments
06:43 PM EST on September 8th, 2012 | 32 comments
12:41 PM EST on September 8th, 2012 | 32 comments
11:31 AM EST on September 8th, 2012 | 21 comments
09:38 PM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 45 comments
12:31 PM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 105 comments
10:58 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 21 comments
10:06 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 35 comments
12:20 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 18 comments
02:58 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 17 comments
01:22 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 17 comments
10:27 AM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 14 comments
07:35 AM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 58 comments
03:37 AM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 26 comments
12:35 AM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 9 comments
06:52 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 30 comments
05:35 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 58 comments
01:19 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 63 comments
10:48 AM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 37 comments
04:37 AM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 38 comments
01:21 AM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 32 comments

Tepco Alters Again: “We replaced photo for physical protection of nuclear materials”

07:21 PM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 75 comments
05:16 PM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 4 comments
02:56 PM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 66 comments
02:25 PM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 26 comments
11:59 AM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 6 comments
06:13 AM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 27 comments
01:03 AM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 17 comments
11:52 PM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 22 comments
04:21 PM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 5 comments
03:13 PM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 34 comments
12:09 PM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 31 comments
10:48 AM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 56 comments
08:22 AM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 24 comments
05:24 AM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 9 comments
08:44 PM EST on September 2nd, 2012 | 6 comments
05:42 PM EST on September 2nd, 2012 | 23 comments
01:34 PM EST on September 2nd, 2012 | 9 comments
12:07 PM EST on September 2nd, 2012 | 19 comments
02:40 AM EST on September 2nd, 2012 | 23 comments
11:38 PM EST on September 1st, 2012 | 26 comments
07:26 PM EST on September 1st, 2012 | 111 comments
03:43 PM EST on September 1st, 2012 | 41 comments


03:42 PM EST on September 8th, 2012 | 66 comments
02:34 PM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 66 comments
01:33 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 20 comments
05:45 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 5 comments
03:49 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 17 comments
09:21 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 86 comments
02:10 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 7 comments
11:10 AM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 11 comments
02:40 AM EST on September 4th, 2012 | 35 comments
08:40 PM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 17 comments
01:52 AM EST on September 3rd, 2012 | 111 comments
05:34 AM EST on September 1st, 2012 | 83 comments
10:20 PM EST on August 30th, 2012 | 25 comments
11:06 AM EST on August 30th, 2012 | 4 comments
10:10 PM EST on August 29th, 2012 | 9 comments
02:35 PM EST on August 29th, 2012 | 4 comments
10:52 AM EST on August 29th, 2012 | 18 comments
01:41 AM EST on August 29th, 2012 | 7 comments
12:45 AM EST on August 29th, 2012 | 2 comments
10:00 PM EST on August 28th, 2012 | 7 comments
12:49 PM EST on August 28th, 2012 | 11 comments
01:58 AM EST on August 28th, 2012 | 13 comments

Radiation Expert: “There are immediate radiation dose concerns” from sinkhole — Gov’t is in denial — “They don’t know what to do about the radioactive contamination”

12:36 AM EST on August 28th, 2012 | 12 comments
08:40 PM EST on August 27th, 2012 | 8 comments
06:48 PM EST on August 27th, 2012 | 26 comments
04:28 PM EST on August 27th, 2012 | 8 comments
12:44 PM EST on August 27th, 2012 | 6 comments
02:09 AM EST on August 27th, 2012 | 9 comments
01:17 AM EST on August 27th, 2012 | Leave a comment
03:00 PM EST on August 26th, 2012 | 77 comments
02:19 PM EST on August 26th, 2012 | 15 comments
01:42 PM EST on August 26th, 2012 | 4 comments
05:15 PM EST on August 25th, 2012 | 16 comments
03:09 PM EST on August 25th, 2012 | 5 comments
02:05 AM EST on August 25th, 2012 | 7 comments
01:39 PM EST on August 23rd, 2012 | 19 comments
12:00 PM EST on August 23rd, 2012 | 18 comments
01:50 PM EST on August 22nd, 2012 | 7 comments
08:37 PM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 35 comments
07:33 PM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 7 comments
03:21 PM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 15 comments
11:47 AM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 4 comments
10:58 PM EST on August 20th, 2012 | 10 comments
04:57 PM EST on August 20th, 2012 | 6 comments

Highest levels of acetone coming from sinkhole area since monitoring began — Most prevalent volatile compound spikes over weekend (CHART)



03:56 PM EST on September 9th, 2012 | 11 comments
08:57 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 45 comments
01:01 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 11 comments
05:03 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 14 comments
03:41 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 2 comments
01:11 PM EST on August 30th, 2012 | 27 comments
03:30 PM EST on August 23rd, 2012 | 36 comments
04:55 PM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 33 comments
05:40 PM EST on August 18th, 2012 | 41 comments
03:32 PM EST on August 8th, 2012 | 16 comments
11:33 AM EST on August 8th, 2012 | 27 comments
11:30 AM EST on August 2nd, 2012 | 14 comments
06:26 AM EST on July 31st, 2012 | 37 comments
12:33 AM EST on July 27th, 2012 | 17 comments
07:29 AM EST on July 23rd, 2012 | 9 comments
10:28 PM EST on July 22nd, 2012 | 18 comments
11:42 AM EST on July 20th, 2012 | 21 comments
05:43 PM EST on July 17th, 2012 | 30 comments
02:33 PM EST on July 15th, 2012 | 41 comments
02:50 AM EST on July 10th, 2012 | 33 comments
08:33 AM EST on July 9th, 2012 | 12 comments
08:06 PM EST on July 5th, 2012 | 19 comments

News Agency: Fukushima children to leave Japan for recovery — “An individual care program will be ensured for each child”

03:56 PM EST on September 9th, 2012 | 11 comments
08:57 AM EST on September 7th, 2012 | 45 comments
01:01 PM EST on September 6th, 2012 | 11 comments
05:03 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 14 comments
03:41 PM EST on September 5th, 2012 | 2 comments
01:11 PM EST on August 30th, 2012 | 27 comments
03:30 PM EST on August 23rd, 2012 | 36 comments
04:55 PM EST on August 21st, 2012 | 33 comments
05:40 PM EST on August 18th, 2012 | 41 comments
03:32 PM EST on August 8th, 2012 | 16 comments
11:33 AM EST on August 8th, 2012 | 27 comments
11:30 AM EST on August 2nd, 2012 | 14 comments
06:26 AM EST on July 31st, 2012 | 37 comments
12:33 AM EST on July 27th, 2012 | 17 comments
07:29 AM EST on July 23rd, 2012 | 9 comments
10:28 PM EST on July 22nd, 2012 | 18 comments
11:42 AM EST on July 20th, 2012 | 21 comments
05:43 PM EST on July 17th, 2012 | 30 comments
02:33 PM EST on July 15th, 2012 | 41 comments
02:50 AM EST on July 10th, 2012 | 33 comments
08:33 AM EST on July 9th, 2012 | 12 comments
08:06 PM EST on July 5th, 2012 | 19 comments

News Agency: Fukushima children to leave Japan for recovery — “An individual care program will be ensured for each child”



Afghanistan could be carved into eight separate “kingdoms” – with some of them potentially ruled by the Taliban – according to a controversial plan under discussion in London and Washington.
In an obscure working document, the European Commission has announced it is working on plans to open European civil airspace to unmanned drones by 2016.
[The Real Unemployment Numbers Are Worse Than You Are Being Told] According to the Obama administration, the unemployment rate in the United States has been slowly coming down over the past couple of years. But is that actually true? When you take a closer look at the data you quickly realize that the real unemployment numbers are much worse than we are being told. F
A last-ditch effort by federal and state law enforcement authorities to hold Wall Street accountable for nearly bringing down the U.S. economy is unlikely to lead to any criminal charges against big bank executives, according to a source close to the investigation.
Lawn and garden products company Scotts Miracle-Gro will pay $12.5 million in fines for poisoning bird feed and violating pesticide laws, officials said Friday.
China and Russia sounded the alarm about the state of the global economy at a summit on Saturday and urged Asian-Pacific countries to protect themselves by forging deeper regional economic ties.
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley among those accused of reaping financial harvest from growing food crisis
Mexican police say they have arrested a suspect in the killing of a US border agent in Arizona in 2010.
Silvio Berlusconi’s summer retreat on Sardinia’s exclusive Costa Smeralda, which gained notoriety for parties with topless models, features an underground cave, complete with an emergency escape exit to the sea.
In December, an American court entered a default judgment against Iran for allegedly having a hand in the September 11th attacks.
The New York Police Department opened its Israeli branch in the Sharon District Police headquarters in Kfar Saba. Charlie Ben-Naim,  a former Israeli and veteran NYPD detective, was sent on this mission.
The radiation that young women are exposed to during a mammogram may actually put them at significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer
The draft proposal, which has been sent to relevant federal agencies for feedback, is a clear sign that the administration is resolved to take action on cybersecurity even as Congress remains gridlocked on legislation that would address the threat.
Although theCongressional Budget Office estimates that the federal government will spend $3.563 trillion in fiscal year 2012 and the White House Office of Management estimates it will be $3.795 trillion, actual withdrawals from the U.S. Treasury have already exceeded $10 trillion.
ECB unlimited bond-buying plan to ‘save the euro’
Excerpts of the report, posted this week on several Iranian websites, revealed that the government might not be able to pay the full salaries of its employees in the coming three months, which threatens the eruption of massive popular protests across the country.
As many as 66 countries would be eligible to buy U.S. drones under new Defense Department guidelines but Congress and the State Department, which have a final say, have not yet opened the spigots for exports, a senior Pentagon official said on
Ridiculous Sideshows Await!
Few observers of the Syrian calamity would have predicted that a final battle of Damascus would have begun so soon with such a lethal display of Syrian opposition strength.
Turkish army officers have assumed direct command of the first two Syrian rebel brigades fighting Bashar Assad’s government forces, according toDEBKAfile’s exclusive sources. This step has sent military tensions rocketing on Israel’s northern borders with Syria and Lebanon in case of a backlash.
The U.S. government debt, which topped $16 trillion for the first time at the close of business on Friday, now equals approximately $136,260 for every household in the country.
Netanyahu cancels security cabinet meeting, citing information leak

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unexpectedly canceled a security cabinet meeting on Wednesday morning, telling ministers that information from the first part of the meeting, held the day before, was leaked.
Russian military prosecutors said Wednesday they would probe flight records and safety measures after a video showing a fighter jet zooming low over a highway became an Internet hit.


CNN international English-language television network has refused to broadcast a documentary which was produced by the US-based network itself but heavily criticized the Bahraini regime’s repression against anti-regime protesters.
Cargill and Others Behind anti-Organic “Stanford Study” Anti-organic “study” is not news, rather, coordinated propaganda campaign.
New claims of waterboarding by the CIA have emerged, contradicting claims by the US authorities that only three people were submitted to a practice widely regarded as
from the ooh-that’s-clever dept
The New York City Police Department (NYPD) really has gone rogue; at least that’s what a high-level FBI official believes.
Impunity for the rich and famous leaves Thais outraged
Television Stations Could Start Using Drones To Cover News Stories

A drone originally developed for military use could soon be used by television stations and journalists as a news-gathering device.
Turkish and American authorities have refused comment on persistent reports that the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is currently on a secret visit to Turkey.
Europe is approaching a crisis as the region’s debt crisis and austerity measures increase the rates of depression, suicide and psychological problems – just as governments cut healthcare spending by up to 50 percent, according to campaigners, policy makers and health organizations.
Just part of keeping you safe!
The United States, like most countries in the world, bans political campaign donations by non-citizens. Since the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. FEC, however, foreigners—including even foreign governments—have been able to evade the law by donating to trade associations.
The European Union is spending millions of pounds developing “Orwellian” technologies designed to scour the internet and CCTV images for “abnormal behaviour”.
Charlotte-Douglas Airport is gearing up for a busy three days of arrivals for the Democratic National Convention.
Washington reportedly sends Tehran indirect message saying it will not back Israeli strike on nuclear facilities as long as Iran refrains from attacking American facilities in Persian Gulf
Germany and China plan to conduct an increasing amount of their trade in euros and yuan, the two nations said in a joint statement after talks between Chancellor Angela Merkel and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in Beijing on Thursday.
A Raleigh-based group devoted to reducing the potential for voter fraud presented the N.C. Board of Elections on Friday with a list of nearly 30,000 names of dead people statewide who are still registered to vote.
Chinese researchers have unveiled a system that allows users to control drones with their thoughts. The technology was designed to help handicapped people, but could have ample applications in other fields as well.
Fed Moves Toward Open-Ended Bond Purchases to Satisfy Bernanke
Armenia warned Azerbaijan it was ready for war as tensions soared Monday between the ex-Soviet foes after Baku pardoned and promoted an Azerbaijani officer who axed an Armenian soldier to death.
Investigators with the Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) have already identified more than 100 serving and former members of the armed forces who they want to interview about the alleged torture of Iraqi civilians.
Boycott corporations monopolizing, misguiding, and destroying human civilization.

Kurt Nimmo | Globalist confab used as stage for more war propaganda.

Infowars.com | A special Infowars Nightly News Report on Agenda 21.

Mike Adams | CDC has released a new zombie apocalypse preparedness campaign.

Kurt Nimmo | Globalists and military-industrial complex want law despite Senate rejecting it in August.

The Hill | “You were born in Hawaii? You have a birth certificate?” the president asked, as the table broke into laughter.

RT | The FBI expects the NGI system to include as many as 14 million photographs by the time the project is in full swing in only two years.

NY Daily News | The ‘alert’ was a humorous way to give advice to citizens on how to prepare for such real threats as hurricanes, earthquakes, pandemics and terrorist attacks.

ABC News | A judge ruled that 10 rare gold coins worth $80 million belonged to the U.S. government, not a family that had sued the U.S. Treasury, saying it had illegally seized them.

Raúl Ilargi Meijer | The West is not pleased.

Eric Blair | It seems whenever the government injects money into a specific industry, prices climb quickly and a bubble of some sort ensues.

Susanne Posel | Droughts, lack of access to nutritional food and an agenda of the global elite to reduce the population are not conspiracy theories.

Teri Webster | Joel Stein went on to suggest a beauty contest could be held for dead fetuses.

Infowars.com | Hedges: “Revolt is all we have left. It is our only hope.”

Lisa Garber | Researchers at North Carolina State University found that bisphenol-A (BPA) exposure in early life stages can actually cause gene expression changes.

Paul Craig Roberts | The only purpose of U.3 is to keep bad news out of the news.

Drone Wars UK | Europe to open skies to drones by 2016 says Commission document.

Infowars.com | Darrin McBreen covers the latest on the Federal Reserve’s plans to print more money out of thin air.

New American | While on a campaign swing through Ohio, President Barack Obama sat down with Fox 19 reporter Ben Swann to discuss a variety of national security and constitutional issues.

Adan Salazar | DHS has managed to realign their cross-hairs to target domestic threats.

Ralph Raico | The best work of Ira Levin’s creative period was never filmed at all.

Infowars.com | Americans, quarantined to militarized districts, become a population ripe for tyrannical control.

Steve Watson | Mobile body scanner program was not discontinued, as agency claims.

Kurt Nimmo | Fed will pump more fiat dollars into economy as job growth shows sharp decline.

Paul Joseph Watson | Screener admits move was retaliatory and had nothing to do with security.

Infowars.com | Medicine in the US is completely controlled by MD’s and MD’s controlled by the pharmaceutical companies.

Mike Adams & Anthony Gucciardi | Over the last several days, the mainstream media has fallen for an elaborate scientific hoax.

Anthony Gucciardi | One New York Times writer in particular has called all health conscious organic consumers ‘narcissists’.

Paul Craig Roberts | If political conventions are ranked on a one to ten scale for intelligence, I give the Republican Convention zero and the Democrats one.

Mac Slavo | It would make perfect sense that everything else belongs to the government as well.

The Economic Collapse | Are you better off today than you were four years ago? This is a question that comes up nearly every election.

Infowars.com | Alex talks with Lenore Skenazy, editor of the Free Range Kids website.

Kurt Nimmo | And it is good news for the Second Amendment and gun rights.

Infowars.com | Like a scene out of Enemy of the State, the NSA wants activists to know the mega-snoop agency is monitoring them.

Paul Joseph Watson | “All they do is read scripture and have giant, giant pictures of dead fetuses”.

Adan Salazar | 92-yead-old Earl Jones: “I aimed right for his heart…”

Steve Watson | Robotics professor warns that DARPA droids will be used to “kill people”.

Kurt Nimmo | A psychological operation to legitimize ever-increasing and absurd TSA demands on passengers.

Paul Joseph Watson | Activist targeted in order to prevent him organizing DNC protest.

The Economic Collapse | The fastest way to go broke in America is to go to the hospital. These days it seems like almost everyone has an outrageous hospital bill story to share.

Mike Adams | The “War on Terror” is a complete fabrication. There is no terrorism other than what the government creates in order to sell its agenda of a police state takeover.

Debkafile | The third US aircraft carrier, USS Stennis, is moving into place off the Iranian Gulf coast.

Saman Mohammadi | Pulitzer prize-winning journalist and bestselling author Chris Hedges spoke with Alex Jones.

Infowars.com | The cost of a massive program to spray sun-dimming particles into the upper atmosphere has been put at just below $5 billion dollars a year.

Infowars.com | The Associated Press has launched a whitewash of the recent controversy.

Linda West | Globalist Wage War on Free Speech and the Press.

Paul Joseph Watson | Activist targeted in order to prevent him organizing DNC protest.

Kurt Nimmo | New York Times adds another angle to the propaganda war on Syria.

Adan Salazar | Demonstrating the sad neurotic state of airport security, a “safety risk” can be declared by a pilot anytime he feels motivated to do so.

Steve Watson | Award winning ICE agent says he was held down for complaining.

Susanne Posel | GAO audit finds transfer of funds from the Fed of NY to the central Bank of China.












Democrat and Republican | Of course cops are exempt…where do you think you are? America?

Washington Post | Victim’s family “cannot understand why [police] did not simply tackle Kyle — who walked with a limp…”

pressfortruth.ca | Canadian military set to conduct drills designed to train military personal in “domestic operations” for urban civilian populations.

Paul Joseph Watson | Screener admits move was retaliatory and had nothing to do with security.

Infowars.com | Alex talks with Lenore Skenazy, editor of the Free Range Kids website.

CBS Tampa | On one stop, cop asked to see woman’s breast augmentation scars.

William Norman Grigg | When faced with growing rebellion, Obama “will send in UN troops.”

Paul Joseph Watson | Activist targeted in order to prevent him organizing DNC protest.

Saman Mohammadi | Pulitzer prize-winning journalist and bestselling author Chris Hedges spoke with Alex Jones.

Paul Joseph Watson | Activist targeted in order to prevent him organizing DNC protest.

Infowars.com | An activist was designated as a terror suspect, put on a watchlist and arrested, ostensibly it seems to prevent him attending a protest.

Paul Joseph Watson | Federal agency re-issues glib response to controversy over liquid testing.

Paul Joseph Watson | Effort to characterize right to assemble as terrorism accelerates.

Information Liberation | Police have to stop this “shoot first, ask questions later” mentality.

Paul Joseph Watson | Federal agency running security checkpoints at public events becoming normalized.

Elizabeth Renter | You own your home and the lot that it sits on.

Examiner | School district wanted his name changed because they felt it violated their ‘no tolerence’ policy because his name sign kind of, sort of, looks like a gun.

My Fox Austin | Austin Police confirmed Friday undercover officers infiltrated the group to gain intelligence about plans of breaking the law.

CBS News | City ordinances adopted earlier this year for “extraordinary events” ban a long list of actions and items that would otherwise be legal.

Ben Wolfgang | Three more leading law enforcement groups on Friday endorsed industry-backed guidelines limiting the use of unmanned aerial vehicles.

Paul Joseph Watson | Black Hawk exercises continue to stir intrigue, concern.

Infowars.com | Alex talks with Derrick Broze, a founding member of The Houston Free Thinkers. Broze has covered TSA agents working in the Metro rail is Houston.

Infowars.com | Larry Grathwohl, the former FBI informant in the Weather Underground who revealed the terrorist group’s plan for re-education camps and the liquidation of millions of Americans.

J. D. Heyes | The shirt features a spoof of the TSA logo along with text that satirizes the agency’s “paranoid and overbearing approach to airport security.”

Paul Joseph Watson | New police brutality clip hits You Tube.

Infowars.com | Independent Journalists were threatened with being “detained for 72 hours” by Homeland Security agents, after they filmed TSA employees.

The American Dream | The way that the U.S. government treats military veterans is absolutely disgraceful.

Infowars.com | “It’s going hot.” Those were the ominous opening and closing words from my source inside the Department of Homeland Security in two separate contacts we had within the last 72 hours.

Paul Joseph Watson | Concerned observers called media, police last night to report choppers.

TheCopBlock | I asserted that they would not be stopping us, in the rain no less, if we had large video cameras with a corporate news logo on the side.

Lauren Ashburn | This is no way to run a convention, and it isn’t even raining yet.

Infowars.com | Another veteran in Chesterfield, Virginia was SWAT-teamed for cleaning his gun on his back porch.

Jamal Thalji | Company planned to outfit small unmanned helicopters and ground vehicles with cameras.

RT.com | The police state prays that anarchists angry at the Republican Party and American establishment all together will justify their extreme over-policing of events.

Paul Joseph Watson | News of similar case emerges day after release of Brandon Raub.

Infowars.com | Alex talks with Jamie Balagia, a trial attorney known as the “DWI Dude.”

Paul Joseph Watson | Inmates moved to make room for demonstrators.

The Moral Liberal | Watch what you say online because the First Amendment appears to have been revoked.

Mike Adams | The U.S. Census Bureau claims you are required by law to reveal your race on their (coercive) questionnaire.

Adan Salazar | Apparently Albuquerque, NM police believe smoking marijuana is a crime that endangers their lives or the lives of others.

Adan Salazar | Victim’s father: “I’m pissed off as hell. A cop could have very easily killed my daughter.”

Paul Joseph Watson | Brandon Raub forcibly transferred to psychiatric facility 3 hours away from legal team, family.

Paul Joseph Watson | Questioning authority is a suspicious activity.

Infowars.com | If you are an outspoken Christian in America, you need to be concerned. If you are an outspoken Christian in America who happens to be a gun owner, you need to be very concerned.

HomelandSecurityUS.com | “Christian gun owners of America, be forewarned.that there is a war against Christianity and an active agenda to disarm Americans.”

Paul Joseph Watson | Social services harass mother for having ‘free range’ children.

Infowars.com | The ADL is attempting to insinuate that Alex Jones was the inspiration behind last week’s murder of two Louisiana police officers.

Adan Salazar | Allegedly, Carter called his girlfriend telling her he would call her back from jail.

Infowars.com | Hundreds of pages of documents reveal that the Department of Homeland Security monitored Infowars stories and user comments.

Stephen Lendman | Freedom in America is endangered. Bipartisan complicity plans destroying it altogether.












*) “Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”

*) § 107.Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include — (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
*) FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational